Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/76603| Title: | Transcendental Inquiry |
| Authors: | Kim, Halla Halla Kim and Steven Hoeltzel |
| Keywords: | Methods and Critiques |
| Issue Date: | 2016 |
| Publisher: | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Description: | Moral realism focuses on the discussion that presupposes moral objects which exist regardless of our argumentation. Habermas does not follow this realism, because he explicitly differentiates between the constative statement and the normative statement. He nevertheless constitutes his moral theory in a cognitivist way. And this is nothing other than the argumentative consensus. Valid moral norms become cognitively acknowledged through the consensus that is enabled by argumentation. Consequently, the validity of the moral principle and of the rules of argumentation is acknowledged every time the validity of the individual moral norm is acknowledged. |
| URI: | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/76603 |
| ISBN: | 978-3-319-40715-9 |
| Appears in Collections: | History |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161.pdf.pdf | 8.93 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.