Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/58786
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoucher, David-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-28T06:47:30Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-28T06:47:30Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.isbn978–0–19–920352–9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/58786-
dc.descriptionLooking back today, what seems most surprising is the unity of purpose shown by the UN member states at the time in adopting the UDHR without a dissenting vote. Now, in the face of numerous, pressing human rights crises, there is no shared vision among world leaders to address contemporary challenges of human rights in a world that is increasingly endangered, unsafe and unequal (Amnesty International 2008:en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford and Portland, Oregonen_US
dc.subjectNatural Law, Natural Rights, andHuman Rights in Transitionen_US
dc.titleThe Limits of Ethics inInternational Relationsen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
37.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.