Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/57217
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJulian Weindling, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-25T06:41:27Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-25T06:41:27Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.isbn1–4039–3911–X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/57217-
dc.descriptionOn 4 March 1945 liberated Auschwitz prisoner doctors made an international declaration on how prisoners had been treated as experimental animals. They urged the Allies and neutral states to bring to trial those responsible.1 They hoped that prosecuting perpetrators would prevent coerced human experiments and medical atrocities from recurring in the future. Survivors and witnesses of human experiments called for documentation of Nazi medical abuses, justice and compensation. Their role in alerting the Allies to medical atrocities, and in declaring the need for a humane and ethical medicine oriented to consent of the patient and research subject merits historical recognition.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen_US
dc.subjectNazi Medicineen_US
dc.titleNazi Medicine and theNuremberg TrialsFrom Medical War Crimes to Informed Consenten_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
25.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.