Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/44042Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Uitz, Renáta | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-15T07:57:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-02-15T07:57:07Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 963 7326 38 3 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/44042 | - |
| dc.description | Intuitively, at least for lawyers, the record book of history appears as a treasury of very sound points of reference. Precisely due to this reputation, constitutional review fora have a tendency to rely on references to history and traditions (historical narratives) in order to clarify or supplement constitutional provisions, to determine their proper scope of application, and sometimes even to substitute constitutional provisions. Prima facie, historical narratives look like the ultimate tools of taming indeterminacy in constitutional interpretation | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Central European University Press | en_US |
| dc.subject | Constitutions | en_US |
| dc.title | Constitutions, Courts and History Historical Narratives in Constitutional Adjudication | en_US |
| dc.type | Book | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Education Planning & Management(EDPM) | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.