Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/18648| Title: | Radical Interpretation in Religion |
| Authors: | Nancy K., Frankenberry |
| Keywords: | Radical Interpretation in Religion |
| Issue Date: | 2004 |
| Publisher: | Cambridge |
| Description: | The following chapters by Terry Godlove, Jeffrey Stout, Richard Rorty, and Wayne Proudfoot draw their inspiration from three variations on the theme of holism: Donald Davidson’s radical interpretation, Robert Brandom’s semantic inferentialism, and the pragmatism of Richard Rorty and William James. Godlove argues that there are good Davidsonian reasons for scholars of religion to keep the category of “belief ” even though it has come under suspicion. Stout replies that, when interpreting belief, as well as “meaning,” “intention,” and “truth,” the Sellarsian model developed by Brandom, rather than the Davidsonian model, is a better alternative for pragmatists |
| URI: | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/18648 |
| ISBN: | 0-511-03056-8 |
| Appears in Collections: | Religion |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.pdf.pdf | 3.03 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.