Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/18648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorNancy K., Frankenberry-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T08:17:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-07T08:17:45Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.isbn0-511-03056-8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/18648-
dc.descriptionThe following chapters by Terry Godlove, Jeffrey Stout, Richard Rorty, and Wayne Proudfoot draw their inspiration from three variations on the theme of holism: Donald Davidson’s radical interpretation, Robert Brandom’s semantic inferentialism, and the pragmatism of Richard Rorty and William James. Godlove argues that there are good Davidsonian reasons for scholars of religion to keep the category of “belief ” even though it has come under suspicion. Stout replies that, when interpreting belief, as well as “meaning,” “intention,” and “truth,” the Sellarsian model developed by Brandom, rather than the Davidsonian model, is a better alternative for pragmatists-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridgeen_US
dc.subjectRadical Interpretation in Religionen_US
dc.titleRadical Interpretation in Religionen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Religion

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20.pdf.pdf3.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.