<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/1749" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/1749</id>
  <updated>2026-04-08T04:34:52Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-08T04:34:52Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Gender and Lynching The Politics of Memory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/71481" />
    <author>
      <name>Simien, Evelyn M.</name>
    </author>
    <id>192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/71481</id>
    <updated>2020-07-14T11:10:50Z</updated>
    <published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Gender and Lynching The Politics of Memory
Authors: Simien, Evelyn M.
Description: The conventional approach to (or master narrative of) American&#xD;
civil rights history has focused almost exclusively on Black male&#xD;
victimhood during the era of lynching, encompassing nearly&#xD;
five decades from 1880–1930. Rather than broaden and deepen our&#xD;
understanding of racial discrimination, however, such an approach often&#xD;
simplifies and distorts the more complex and devastating history of lynching&#xD;
in the United States.2 Indeed, both academic and popular discussions&#xD;
of lynching are dominated by a static, fixed understanding of deprivation&#xD;
that is principally racially based. Far less common is an association of&#xD;
the era with a richer, more nuanced understanding of deprivation that is&#xD;
critical of hierarchal relationships determined by interlocking systems of&#xD;
oppression—namely, racism and sexism</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gender, Work and Education in Britain in the 1950s</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/71435" />
    <author>
      <name>Spencer, Stephanie</name>
    </author>
    <id>192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/71435</id>
    <updated>2020-07-14T11:06:55Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Gender, Work and Education in Britain in the 1950s
Authors: Spencer, Stephanie</summary>
    <dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/52952" />
    <author>
      <name>The World Bank</name>
    </author>
    <id>192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/52952</id>
    <updated>2020-07-14T11:04:57Z</updated>
    <published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook
Authors: The World Bank
Description: Seventy- five percent of the world’s poor live in rural areas, and most are involved in farming. In the 21st century,&#xD;
agriculture remains fundamental to economic growth, poverty alleviation, and environmental sustainability.&#xD;
The World Bank’s Agriculture and Rural Development publication series presents recent analyses of issues that&#xD;
affect agriculture’s role as a source of economic development, rural livelihoods, and environmental services. The&#xD;
series is intended for practical application, and we hope that it will serve to inform public discussion, policy&#xD;
formulation, and development planning</summary>
    <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sexual Decoys</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/52951" />
    <author>
      <name>Eisenstein, Zillah</name>
    </author>
    <id>192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/52951</id>
    <updated>2020-07-14T11:03:31Z</updated>
    <published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Sexual Decoys
Authors: Eisenstein, Zillah
Description: In this book, Zillah Eisenstein continues her unforgiving indictment of&#xD;
neoliberal imperial politics. She charts its most recent militarist and masculinist&#xD;
configurations through discussions of the Afghan and Iraq wars,&#xD;
violations at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, the 2004 US Presidential&#xD;
election, and Hurricane Katrina. She warns that women’s rights rhetoric&#xD;
is being manipulated, particularly by Condoleezza Rice and other women&#xD;
in the Bush administration, as a ploy for global dominance and a misogynistic&#xD;
capture of democratic discourse. However, Eisenstein also believes&#xD;
that the plural and diverse lives of women will lay the basis for an assault&#xD;
on these fascistic elements. This new politics will both confound and&#xD;
clarify feminisms, and reconfigure democracy across the globe</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

