Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/78108
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorA. Farber, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T06:16:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T06:16:57Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-19-537120-8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/78108-
dc.descriptionThis is a short book, but it took a long time to write. In two previous books, Beyond All Reason and Desperately Seeking Certainty, we criticized some currently popular theories like originalism, the view (held by many conservative constitutional scholars) that the Constitution’s meaning is fi xed by the history of its creation. We also criticized theories of leading scholars at the other end of the ideological spectrum.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxforden_US
dc.subjectJudicial discretion—United Statesen_US
dc.titleJudgment Callsen_US
dc.title.alternativePrinciple and Politics in Constitutional Lawen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3.pdf.pdf1.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.