Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/76478
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiagioli, Francesca-
dc.contributor.editorFrancesca Biagiolien_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-24T07:24:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-24T07:24:41Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-31779-3-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/76478-
dc.descriptionThis book offers a reconstruction of the debate on non-Euclidean geometry in neoKantianism between the second half of the nineteenth century and the fi rst decades of the twentieth century. Kant famously characterized space and time as a priori forms of intuitions, which lie at the foundation of mathematical knowledge. The success of his philosophical account of space was due not least to the fact that Euclidean geometry was widely considered to be a model of certainty at his time. However, such later scientifi c developments as non-Euclidean geometries and Einstein’s general theory of relativity called into question the certainty of Euclidean geometry and posed the problem of reconsidering space as an open question for empirical research. The transformation of the concept of space from a source of knowledge to an object of research can be traced back to a tradition, which includes mathematicians such as Carl Friedrich Gauss, Bernhard Riemann, Richard Dedekind, Felix Klein, and Henri Poincaré, and which found oneen_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectGeometry from Helmholtzen_US
dc.titleSpace, Number, and Geometry from Helmholtz to Cassireren_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:History

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
132.pdf.pdf3.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.