Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/76062
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Fabian-
dc.contributor.editorFabian Wendten_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-22T07:45:53Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-22T07:45:53Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-28877-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/76062-
dc.descriptionTh e main claim of this book is that peace and public justifi cation are values that provide moral reasons to compromise in politics. Before being able to argue for this claim, I have to develop a reasonably precise conception of compromises. Th is is what I aim to do in this and the next three chapters. 1 Th e core of the notion of a compromise, I suggest, is that two or more parties agree to an arrangement which they regard as a mere second-best.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen_US
dc.subjectPublic Justifi cationen_US
dc.titleCompromise, Peace and Public Justifi cationen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:History

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
55.pdf.pdf6.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.