Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/6485
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorHazel, Kemshall-
dc.contributor.editorGill, McIvor-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-03T07:15:33Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-03T07:15:33Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.isbn1 84642 030 X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/6485-
dc.descriptionThe concepts of the ‘predatory paedophile’ and ‘stranger-danger’ have been potent constructions, although the extent to which they are mediaconstructed ‘moral panics’ (Kitzinger 1999a, 1999b) or ‘barometers of the state of the nation’ has been hotly debated (Soothill and Soothill 1993, p.19; Wilczynski and Sinclair 1999, p.276). Kitzinger, for example, identifies the roots of the ‘moral panic’ in the mid-1980s’ creation of the BBC’s ‘Childwatch’ and the inception of ‘Childline’. Certainly, the sex offender has been portrayed as particularly demonic with non-familial paedophiles constructed as ‘Others’ to be ‘put under surveillance, punished, contained and constrained’ (Young 1996, p. 9). Sanders and Lyon have described this as ‘repetitive retribution’ (1995) with a significant impact upon penal policy decisions (Muncie 1999).-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJessica Kingsleyen_US
dc.subjectManaging Sex Offender Risken_US
dc.titleManaging Sex Offender Risken_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Social Work

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
165.pdf.pdf870.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.