Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/57890
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJojarth, Christine-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-26T07:19:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-26T07:19:43Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.isbn3 978-0-511-51810-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/57890-
dc.descriptionWhy did states agree that the global fight against drug trafficking should be led by an international organization vested with an independent legal personality, a considerable budget, and powerful direct and indirect enforcement tools, but fail to adopt a similarly far-reaching form of institutionalized cooperation to combat illicit transfers in small arms and light weapons? This question is striking, because the trafficking of narcotic drugs and of small arms and light weapons seem – at first glance – to be very similar public policy problems: both kill and ruin the health of a comparable number of people; both provide a playground for profit-seeking criminals as well as ideologically motivated rebels and terrorists; and both require the coordinated response of a large number of producer, transhipment, and consumer countries.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectDesigning International Cooperationen_US
dc.titleCrime, War, andGlobal TraffickingDesigning International Cooperationen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
61.pdf1.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.