Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/56324Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.provenance | en | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Wempe, Ben | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-21T08:20:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-21T08:20:02Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1999 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/56324 | - |
| dc.description | This article sets out two central theses. Both theses primarily involve a fundamental criticism of current contractarian business ethics (CBE), but if these can be sustained, they also constitute two boundary conditions for any future contractarian theory of business ethics. The first, which I label the self-discipline thesis, claims that current CBE would gain considerably in focus if more attention were paid to the logic of the social contract argument | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Business Ethics | en_US |
| dc.title | In Defense of A Self-Disciplined, Domain-Specificsocial Contract Theory of Business Ethics | en_US |
| dc.type | Book | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Education Planning & Management(EDPM) | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.