Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/54531
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.editor | Arbour, Louise | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-18T06:21:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-18T06:21:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-92-1-154182-3 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/54531 | - |
dc.description | Hybrid courts are defined as courts of mixed composition and jurisdiction, encompassing both national and international aspects, usually operating within the jurisdiction where the crimes occurred. This rule-of-law policy tool aims to serve two purposes: first, to explore the potential positive impact hybrid courts may have on the domestic justice system of post-conflict States so as to ensure a lasting legacy for the rule of law and respect for human rights; second, to examine how hybrid courts can receive the mandates and necessary political support required to be more effective in terms of legacy and capacity-building | en_US |
dc.language | en | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | UNITED NATIONS | en_US |
dc.subject | Hybrid courts | en_US |
dc.title | RULE-OF-LAW TOOLS FOR POST-CONFLICT STATESMaximizing the legacyof hybrid courts | en_US |
dc.type | Book | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Education Planning & Management(EDPM) |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.