Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/53446
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRenfrew, Colin-
dc.contributor.editorEZRA B. W. ZUBROW-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T10:37:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-13T10:37:23Z-
dc.date.issued1994-
dc.identifier.isbn0 521 43488 2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/53446-
dc.descriptionOne of the most taxing problems in archaeology is to determine about what and in what manner did prehistoric people think. Is it possible to make the 'mute stones speak', and will they tell us how (if not what) our predecessors were thinking? A fundamental challenge in archaeology is to develop the theory, methodology and tools to understand prehistoric cognition. It appears that as processual archaeology revolutionized archaeology in the 1960s and 1970s, cognitive archaeology will revolutionize the 1990s and even the early part of the twenty-first century. Cognitive science is still in its childhood and cognitive archaeology is in its infancy. One direction (already followed by some) has been to develop an 'interpretationist', anti-scientific literary approach. This view, allied to the relativist philosophy of 'post-modernism', has been associated with Hodder, Shanks and Tilley, and Leone. A second, recent approach has been to use a linguistic framework and develop a hermeneutic, semiotic approach. This direction has been espoused by Gardin and Peebles.-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectCognition and cultureen_US
dc.titleThe ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Archeology and Heritage Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
57.Colin Renfrew.pdf14.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.