Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/53163Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 0-19-92889-4 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Curthoys, Mark | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-13T07:35:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-13T07:35:17Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/53163 | - |
| dc.description | ‘We legislate for individuals, while we are, in fact, surrounded by corporations’, a newspaper writer commented in November , as the lengthy strike in the Preston cotton trade showed no sign of collapse.¹ That celebrated dispute exposed the extent of collective activity and organization among both masters and operatives, and challenged many prevailing assumptions about economic and social behaviour. It also posed a practical, and growing problem for legislators | en_US |
| dc.language | en | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Oxford NewYork | en_US |
| dc.subject | Governments | en_US |
| dc.title | Governments, Labour,and the Law in Mid-Victorian Britain The Trade Union Legislation of the s | en_US |
| dc.type | Book | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Education Planning & Management(EDPM) | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.