Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/52523
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJ. G. Winter, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.editorBenjamin I. Pageen_US
dc.contributor.editorSusan Herbst-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-11T06:38:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-11T06:38:29Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-226-90237-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/52523-
dc.descriptionThis book is about the ways that our mental categories shape our understanding of novel political phenomena. In particular, it explores how political rhetoric can engage our ideas about race or about gender even when the subject at hand has nothing explicit to do with either race or gender—a process I call “group implication.” This phenomenon is captured in the subtitle.-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicagoen_US
dc.subjectPolitical psychology—Case studiesen_US
dc.titleDangerous Framesen_US
dc.title.alternativeHow Ideas about race and Gender Ghape Public Opinionen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Gender

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12.pdf.pdf1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.