Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/51598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorL . K O H L, P H I L I P-
dc.contributor.editorMARA KOZELSKY-
dc.contributor.editorNACHMAN BEN-YEHUDA-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-07T05:36:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-07T05:36:46Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-226-45058-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/51598-
dc.descriptionThe thirteen case studies presented here illustrate how reconstructions of the remote past from early historical or archaeological sources may be manipulated to support and validate contemporary political purposes, including specific nationalist agendas. This collection has been a long time in the making. It was conceived, a decade ago, as a sequel to the volume edited by Philip L. Kohl and Clare Fawcett in 1995, Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology, which focused on the relationship between nationalism and archaeology in Europe and East Asia. The new collection was intended to extend the discussion by treating the Near East and South Asia. But in the years since 1995, numerous studies have examined the political context in which archaeology and the reconstruction of the remote past are practiced-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.subjectArchaeology and state—Case studies.en_US
dc.titleSelective Remembrancesen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Archeology and Heritage Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7.P H I L I P L . K O H L.pdf2.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.