Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/51059
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorJohnston, David-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-06T07:20:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-06T07:20:19Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.isbn0-511-02929-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/51059-
dc.descriptionIn recent years unjustified enrichment has been one of the most intellectuallyvital areas of private law. There is, however, still no unanimityamong civil-law and common-law legal systems about how to structure this important branch of the law of obligations. Several keyissues are considered comparativelyhere, including grounds for recoveryof enrichment, defences, third-partyenrichment, as well as proprietaryand taxonomic questionsen_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectUnjustified Enrichmenten_US
dc.titleUnjustified Enrichment:Key Issues in Comparative Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
32.pdf3.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.