Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/49961
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiliker, Paula-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T08:02:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-04T08:02:40Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-521-76337--
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/49961-
dc.descriptionLike most lawyers, I first came across the doctrine of vicarious liability in tort as a student. I found it somewhat of an oddity: a principle of strict liability in an area of law dominated by fault, notably the tort of negligence. Vicarious liability seemed to be the cuckoo in the nest; imposing liability without fault on innocent parties (usually employers) regardless of their attempts to exercise reasonable care.en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.subjectA Comparative Perspectiveen_US
dc.titleVicarious Liability in Tort:A Comparative Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11.pdf1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.