Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/4798
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJeane, W. Anastas-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T06:18:59Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-26T06:18:59Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.isbn0–231–11890–2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/4798-
dc.descriptionThis textbook has many goals. One of them is to present science and research from an epistemological position that can embrace a range of models of inquiry. Instead of adopting the heuristic perspective (Heineman Pieper 1985, 1989; Tyson 1992, 1995), which might best be described as a standpoint rather than as an epistemology, we embrace fallibilistic realism (Manicas & Secord 1983), described in chapter 1, as our epistemological framework. This perspective is one from which both what have been termed “qualitative” or naturalistic methods and traditional quantitative methods can be valued, learned, and taught. We use the terms flexible and fixed methods to differentiate these two general styles of doing research-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherColumbia Universityen_US
dc.subjectSocial service—Researchen_US
dc.titleResearch Design for Social Work and the Human Servicesen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Social Work

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
38.pdf.pdf7.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.