Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/47284
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorChalhoub-Deville, Micheline-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T08:46:05Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-25T08:46:05Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.isbn90 272 1963-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/47284-
dc.descriptionThe paper discusses the variability of test takers’ performances across different language tasks. We concentrate attention on this aspect of variability because inconsistent achievement by test takers across tasks has emerged as a significant threat to reliability and validity. The first section of the chapter addresses how language testers have traditionally conceptualized and measured variability, while the second part advocates an alternate way of thinking about the issue. Our intent should not be construed as a defense of or apology for the dominant paradigm employed by many language testersen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subjectInferenceen_US
dc.titleInference and Generalizabilityin Applied LinguisticsMultiple perspectivesen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
42.pdf1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.