Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/46673
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Morley, Neville | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-22T06:48:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-22T06:48:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 0-203-56956-3 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/46673 | - |
dc.description | The place of ‘theory’ in the study of the past is controversial. Some historians believe that the use of ideas and concepts from disciplines like economics and sociology produces anachronistic and distorted accounts. Others argue that all historians use generalisations about human nature and the workings of society—in other words, some sort of ‘theory’—but that most are unconscious of the assumptions on which their accounts of the past depend, a position with its own set of problems | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Theories, Models | en_US |
dc.title | Theories, Models andConcepts in AncientHistory | en_US |
dc.type | Book | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Education Planning & Management(EDPM) |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.