Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/45781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorSarat, Austin-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-20T07:54:51Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-20T07:54:51Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-7623-1486-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/45781-
dc.descriptionThis chapter offers an explanation for the mixed record of the Supreme Court since the 1960s, and considers the implications of that record for the future. The chapter emphasizes that judicial power is connected to choices made by other political actors. We argue that conventional ways of measuring the impact of Court rulings and the Court’s treatment of precedents are misleading. The Court cannot be understood as a countermajoritarian protector of rights. In both past and future, electoral outcomes determine the policy areas in which the Court will be influential, and also the choices the justices make about how to portray their treatment of law and precedents.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJAI Pressen_US
dc.subjectPoliticsen_US
dc.titleSpecial Issueconstitutionalpolitics In Aconservative Eraen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Education Planning & Management(EDPM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
119.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.