Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/28299
Title: | Confronting scale In archaeology |
Authors: | Lock, Gary Brian Leigh Molyneaux |
Keywords: | archaeology |
Issue Date: | 2006 |
Publisher: | Springer |
Description: | Archaeological analysis operates on a continuum of scale from the microscopic analysis of a single artifact to regional interpretations of cultural adaptations over thousands of years. A common assumption is that shifting from one scale to another in space and time is a seamless process. Scale in this sense is invisible, a mere mathematical abstraction. Yet, issues of scale exist at the fundamental level of archaeological interpretation. The traditional analytical debate in archaeology – between advocates of the so-called ‘‘processual’’ and ‘‘postprocessual’’ approaches – ranges around the question of scales of reasoning. At the one extreme, remote observation and the ability to interpret events and processes over vast reaches of time and space are possible, because the analysis concerns the hoped-for elucidation of general cultural processes; at the other, they are not, as both analyst and subject are isolated in their own subjectivities. Analysts occupying the middle ground often advocate a ‘‘multidimensional’’ or ‘‘holistic’’ approach, which involves multiple scales of analysis and interpretation. |
URI: | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/28299 |
ISBN: | 978-0387-32772-3 |
Appears in Collections: | Archeology and Heritage Management |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.