Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/26829
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Michael Redclift | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-03T08:38:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-03T08:38:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 0-203-40888-8 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/26829 | - |
dc.description | Sustainable development seems assured of a place in the litany of development truisms, but to what extent does it express convergent, rather than divergent, intellectual traditions? The constant reference to ‘sustainability’ as a desirable objective has served to obscure the contradictions that ‘development’ implies for the environment. Instead of bringing intellectual rigour to the discussion of environment and development, we frequently encounter moral convictions as substitutes for thought. However important these convictions, in partnership with rigorous analysis, they are no substitute for it. | - |
dc.language | en | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Development | en_US |
dc.title | Sustainable Development EXPLORING THE CONTRADICTIONS | en_US |
dc.type | Book | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Regional and Local Development Studies |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.pdf.pdf | 2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.