Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/2665
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.editorJosé, Gabriel-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T09:16:52Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-19T09:16:52Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.isbn978-2-88919-668-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/2665-
dc.descriptionDeception has been of interest to psychologists, forensic experts, and laymen (Woodruff and Premack, 1979; Whiten and Byrne, 1988; Saarni and Lewis, 1993; Bradley et al., 1996; Walters, 2000). It has triggered trans-disciplinary scientific investigations within anthropology;philosophy;cognitive,social,and forensic psychology; and recently, cognitive neuroscience. Among the reasons for studying deception, determining the motivation for deceptive behavior, and enhancing recognition of deceptive strategies appear to be of core interesten
dc.languageenen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleDecision-Making Experiments Under Analysisen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Veterinary Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
5.pdf.PDF11.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.