Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/21699
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLaura Bernardi-
dc.contributor.authorKeim, Sylvia-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-15T09:08:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-15T09:08:26Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-531-17784-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/21699-
dc.descriptionSociological analyses of contemporary Western societies often stress the relevance of individualization processes. As ambiguous as the term “individualization” is, it contains a clear underlying proposition. With the emergence of welfare states and market systems, familial bonds that formerly served as organizational principles have ceased to be relevant. Individual autonomy has increasingly corresponded to the well-known proverb that “every man is the architect of his own fortune”. Accordingly, some sociological theories have set out to focus on the individual, on his/her behavior, and treat social institutions and structures as external effects. These rational choice theories are well established, and have been successfully applied in various research fields, but they are also occasionally criticized as representing a rather “naive” concept of individual decisionmaking, especially when they presume that individuals act only based on their attitudes and interests, and neglect the impact of social structures (e.g., Burkart, 1994).-
dc.descriptionSociological analyses of contemporary Western societies often stress the relevance of individualization processes. As ambiguous as the term “individualization” is, it contains a clear underlying proposition. With the emergence of welfare states and market systems, familial bonds that formerly served as organizational principles have ceased to be relevant. Individual autonomy has increasingly corresponded to the well-known proverb that “every man is the architect of his own fortune”. Accordingly, some sociological theories have set out to focus on the individual, on his/her behavior, and treat social institutions and structures as external effects. These rational choice theories are well established, and have been successfully applied in various research fields, but they are also occasionally criticized as representing a rather “naive” concept of individual decisionmaking, especially when they presume that individuals act only based on their attitudes and interests, and neglect the impact of social structures-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVS Verlagen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adults’ Decision Making About Parenthooden_US
dc.titleSocial Networks and Family Formation Processes Young Adults’ Decision Making About Parenthooden_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Gender

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sylvia Keim.pdf1.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.