Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/1780
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCatharine, Cookson-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T08:31:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-17T08:31:46Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.isbn0-19-512944-X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/1780-
dc.descriptionA philosophy of emotivism is often behind judicial proclamations of inability to achieve equity in the unusual, atypical situation. Judges defer slavishly to the democratic political process which produces a law, professing an inability to choose meaningfully between competing values even when faced with a situation which may not fit the paradigm the law at issue was meant to address. This claim of “institutional incompetence” mirrors the emotivist’s project. As Alasdair MacIntyre in After Virtuenotes, at the heart of emotivism is the belief that all discourse on values and principles is premised simply upon personal preference and mere opinion-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxforden_US
dc.subjectFreedom of religion—United Statesen_US
dc.titleRegulating Religionen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Religion

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
4.pdf.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.