Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/17781
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSteven M., Wasserstrom-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T12:13:29Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-05T12:13:29Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.isbn0-691-00540-0-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/17781-
dc.descriptionTHE IDEA of religion after religion has dominated my study of Gershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade, and Henry Corbin in the quarter century since they first attracted my attention. Like other readers, I wondered what kind of religion these awe-inspiring scholars represented. I asked myself whether they had experiential or even initiatic warrants for their authoritative expositions of esoteric and “secret” traditions. Later, when I routinely used their work as a teacher and scholar in the history of religions, I tended to push aside these curiosities, which seemed unduly probing-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton Universityen_US
dc.subjectReligion—Philosophy—History—20th century.en_US
dc.titleReligion after religionen_US
dc.title.alternativeGershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade, and Henry Corbin at Eranosen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Religion

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
29.pdf.pdf1.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.