Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/14205
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartha G., Bell-
dc.contributor.editorJorge Rabassa-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-24T09:15:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-24T09:15:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-52331-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.6.20.12:80/handle/123456789/14205-
dc.descriptionRecent literature in the broadly defined field of political ecology has critically discussed community-based conservation and development projects, including those related to payments for ecological services and to climate change mitigation (there are many examples, but see Agrawal and Gibson 1999; Bebbington 2000, 2001; Evans, Murphy and de Jong 2014; Himley 2009; Perreault 2009). Drawing on earlier insights from cultural ecologists such as Netting, who argued that foreign development projects (at least in Africa) tended to ignore “the existence of working indigenous solutions to the problems of farming an alien environment” (Netting 1993: 22); much of the focus of this work has been to evaluate how well these projects fit (or do not fit) with the ecological, social, and political dynamics of the communities in which they are applied-
dc.languageenen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectA Case Study from the Peruvian Andesen_US
dc.titlePottery, Livelihoods, and Landscapesen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Case Study from the Peruvian Andesen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
Appears in Collections:Archeology and Heritage Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
86.pdf.pdf3.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.