Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/105389Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Sophia Ji & Craig Deegan | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-11T07:06:09Z | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-15T23:01:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-11T07:06:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-05-15T23:01:05Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://196.189.45.87:8080/handle/123456789/105389 | - |
| dc.description | This paper represents the second part of a broader study exploring Australian corporations’ disclosure practices as they relate to contaminated sites. The first part of the broader study described the processes that must be undertaken to identify Australian contaminated sites. This research, which culminated in a paper entitled ‘Finding information about contaminated sites in Australia – There has to be a better way’ (Deegan and Ji 2008), revealed that publicly available sources of information are widely dispersed between various state and local government agencies and departments, and when considered together, provide incomplete information about contaminated sites in terms of their location, the extent and nature of the contamination, and the parties responsible for the contamination. | en_US |
| dc.language | English | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | CPA Australia | - |
| dc.subject | Accounting for Contaminated Sites: | en_US |
| dc.title | Accounting for Contaminated Sites: How Transparent areAustralian Companies? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Accounting and Finance | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.