Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
192.168.6.56/handle/123456789/105387
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | DAVID C. MATZ, VERLIN B. HINSZ | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-11T07:03:35Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-15T23:01:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-11T07:03:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-15T23:01:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://196.189.45.87:8080/handle/123456789/105387 | - |
dc.description | This study attempted to address the question: Why do some people tend to remain independent in the face of influence? Our hypothesis was that a portion of the variability attributed to individual differences in previous studies of influence could be accounted for by an individual's intrinsic motivation to be consistent, as assessed by his or her preference for consistency. We found preference for consistency to be a significant predictor of an individual's likelihood to alter his or her response when an initial position was held, but not when no initial position was held. | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | - |
dc.subject | Accounting for Consistency | en_US |
dc.title | Accounting for Consistency and Change in Responses to Influence Attempts: An Examination of Preference for Consistency | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Accounting and Finance |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.